<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Lose Friends and Misinfluence Vampires</title>
	<link>http://laermer.com/2009/06/25/how-to-lose-friends-and-misinfluence-vampires/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don The Idea Guy</title>
		<link>http://laermer.com/2009/06/25/how-to-lose-friends-and-misinfluence-vampires/#comment-9714</link>
		<dc:creator>Don The Idea Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://laermer.com/2009/06/25/how-to-lose-friends-and-misinfluence-vampires/#comment-9714</guid>
		<description>Would like to see a screenshot of the posts in place to see how offensive I would have found them myself, but based on the current Gawker layout -- I absolutely agree they should have been labeled as "sponsored." But, other than that, it seems like they were at least TRYING to be creative and break out of the traditional advertising spaces that are all but ignored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would like to see a screenshot of the posts in place to see how offensive I would have found them myself, but based on the current Gawker layout &#8212; I absolutely agree they should have been labeled as &#8220;sponsored.&#8221; But, other than that, it seems like they were at least TRYING to be creative and break out of the traditional advertising spaces that are all but ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don The Idea Guy</title>
		<link>http://laermer.com/2009/06/25/how-to-lose-friends-and-misinfluence-vampires/#comment-9713</link>
		<dc:creator>Don The Idea Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://laermer.com/2009/06/25/how-to-lose-friends-and-misinfluence-vampires/#comment-9713</guid>
		<description>Would like to see a screenshot of the posts in place to see of offensive I would have found them myself, but based on the current Gawker layout -- I absolutely agree they should have been labeled as "sponsored." But, other than that it seems like they were at least TRYING to be creative and break out of the traditional advertising spaces that are all but ignored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would like to see a screenshot of the posts in place to see of offensive I would have found them myself, but based on the current Gawker layout &#8212; I absolutely agree they should have been labeled as &#8220;sponsored.&#8221; But, other than that it seems like they were at least TRYING to be creative and break out of the traditional advertising spaces that are all but ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

